RX 6600 vs RTX 3050: Compare AMD and Nvidia Graphics Cards for better gaming performance.

AMD's Radeon RX 6600 and Nvidia's GeForce RTX 3050 are two entry-level PC graphics cards. They are aimed at gamers interested in running games in Full HD, although they can be used even at higher resolutions, with some sacrifice in performance. Both support Ray Tracing technology, a feature that more faithfully reproduces lights and shadows in games.

Despite being entry-level models, the GPUs are state-of-the-art and offer prices in the range of $ 500 in the market. Next, we've gathered the fundamental technical specifications of the two products, performance levels, and the technologies and features that can differentiate one from the other and better inform your purchase.


AMD's Radeon RX 6600
Radeon RX 6600 has 8 GB of memory — Image Source: Sapphire

Both with intermediate profiles, the AMD and Nvidia cards are similar in a number of aspects, such as, for example, the offer of real-time Ray Tracing through hardware. Between the two, the RX 6600 is the oldest on the market: Radeon comes with a graphics processor with 1,792 stream processors arranged in 28 compute units, plus 28 RT cores for ray tracing.

👉 5 tips to successfully build a gaming PC from scratch

GeForce offers a graphics processor with 2,560 CUDA cores and 20 processing units for ray-tracing effects. Unlike the AMD solution, the Nvidia card still has 80 Tensor cores, used for artificial intelligence processing and indispensable in the application of DLSS, upscaling technology, and image reconstruction that uses artificial intelligence.

Nvidia's GeForce RTX 3050
RTX 3050 GPU arrived on the market in January — Image Source: Nvidia

In terms of speed, AMD runs at higher clocks. Radeon's standard is 1,626 MHz, with a turbo to hit 2,491 MHz maximum, in addition to a speed range of its own for games at 2,044 MHz. The GeForce goes at 1,777 MHz via turbo, operating at a standard speed of 1,552 MHz.

In terms of RAM, things are very similar: both are 8 GB GDDR6 cards, connected via a 128-bit interface to the graphics processor. This gives the two GPUs a bandwidth of 224 GB/s of data exchange between the two components.


The two cards are very similar but, in general, the RX 6600 is faster. Results aggregated by GPU UserBenchmark indicate that Radeon is on average 7% faster in general use and in games, especially considering titles running with raster lighting techniques, without Ray Tracing.

Ray Tracing
Both GPUs support Ray Tracing Technology- Image Source: Nvidia

With ray tracing on the scene, GeForce tends to regain ground. Nvidia's technology is more mature and better supported at the moment, which may explain a 17% advantage for GeForce in the real-time simulation of light behavior.


The two GPUs are very close in terms of resources, but there is an important differential that ends up only present in Nvidia: the DLSS. This technique uses artificial intelligence to generate a final image of higher resolution from a much lower internal resolution, ensuring higher-quality graphics without weighing too much on performance.

The AI ​​technique still doesn't have a parallel in AMD cards, but there is an alternative: the FSR. It is AMD's upscaling technology that, if on the one hand, it owes the quality and performance gains of DLSS, it has the advantage of being supported by more games. Furthermore, the FSR can run on both a Radeon and a GeForce.



           With similar performance, the two cards should register similar consumption levels — Image Source: Asus

Another point of similarity between the two products revolves around the expectation of electrical consumption. According to the two brands, the two GPUs should reach up to 130 W of power when in 100% operating mode. This data, it is worth remembering, does not mean that the two cards represent the consumption of 130 W since they will hardly be at 100% utilization all the time.

In addition to signaling the level of energy that the products need to work, both AMD and Nvidia also indicate the minimum power of the source that powers your computer. 300 W is required in both cases.

Price and availability

AMD's card is the more expensive of the two, at least at the moment and according to our price surveys. Radeon versions produced by AsRock and Sapphire currently appear at $ 329, although editions with better specs and features may appear at higher prices.

GeForce is easily found in the national market, starting at $ 453 in the Palit edition. EVGA, Nvidia's great partner, also puts a version on the market, starting at $ 249, while there are Asus editions for $ 378.49.


Both graphics cards are entry-level and offer a very similar level of performance and features. The performance is similar and both cards will have breath for recent games in Full HD with a good level of graphic fidelity.

👉 How to build and how much would it cost to build a gaming pc?
RX 6600 vs RTX 3050: Compare AMD and Nvidia Graphics Cards for better gaming  performance.

The difference appears when you consider the comparison from other points of view: do you enjoy games that use DLSS If so, GeForce fires are the most recommended choice. Are you keen to enjoy graphics with Ray Tracing? Once again, the RTX 3050 is the most recommended choice — especially considering it costs less.

Post a Comment